Originally by: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/britain-to-maintain-eu-influence-6274562.html published: 09 December 2011
During the summit in Brussels on 8th December, the Prime Minister of UK decided to veto treaty changes designed to save the single currency.
According to the Labour Party, Liberal Democrats and UK Independence Party are against the veto and fear for the consequences of their country. Because of this decisions there is potentially an increased risk of a two-speed Europe in which Britain's position becomes more marginalized, and in the long-run that would be bad for growth and jobs in this country. Several EU countries did also not appreciate the veto.
The Conservatives and eurosceptics welcomed the veto as a step towards looser UK relations with the EU and single market.
The Prime Minster, David Cameron insisted that Britain’s influence in Europe will be maintained despite his dramatic decision. He admitted the relationship with the eurozone might change, but the core of the relationship remains as it was.
My reaction:
For me it was a bit hard to understand the article because it contained political terms and specific political information. I am not really into politics so I have searched for the meaning of some words.
Regarding the veto treaty, I totally agree with the parties who are against the used veto of the Prime Minster. Many countries in the eurozone are not pleased with the veto to save the single currency. I think, the Prime Minister should not taken such a dramatic decision that make the UK an unloved member of the eurozone and can have a negative influence for the citizens of the UK.
I think the Prime Minister should ask the people of the UK if they want to remain their currency or the UK should join the Euro.